The increasing concentration of carbon dioxide (CO₂) in the atmosphere is a primary driver of climate change, necessitating innovative solutions to mitigate its impact. Carbon capture, storage, and sequestration (CCS) have emerged as a pivotal strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in energy-intensive industries. This article delves into the critical components of CCS, its technological advancements, and the challenges that need to be addressed for large scale implementation.
Carbon Capture
The first step in CCS involves capturing CO₂ emissions from point sources such as power plants, cement factories, and chemical industries. The three main technologies for carbon capture are (Figure 1):
Pre-combustion capture: This method involves gasifying fossil fuels to produce a mixture of hydrogen and CO₂. The CO₂ is separated before combustion, leaving hydrogen as a clean energy source. This process is efficient but requires significant upfront investment.
Post-combustion capture: In this approach, CO₂ is separated from flue gases after combustion using chemical solvents such as amines. This method is widely applicable to existing facilities but can be energy-intensive.
Oxy-fuel combustion: This process burns fossil fuels in pure oxygen instead of air, producing a flue gas primarily composed of CO₂ and water vapor. The CO₂ can be easily captured after condensation of the water vapor.
Figure 1. Principles of CO₂ capture technologies: Overview of the main approaches for capturing carbon dioxide from industrial processes, including pre-combustion capture, post-combustion capture, and oxy-fuel combustion. Extracted from Eldardiry and Habib (2018).
According to Singh et al. (2023), post-combustion capture remains the most widely researched technology due to its compatibility with existing infrastructure. However, the energy penalty associated with solvent regeneration continues to challenge its cost-effectiveness.
Carbon Storage
Once captured, CO₂ must be securely transported and stored to prevent its re-release into the atmosphere. The most common storage methods include:
Geological storage: CO₂ is injected into deep underground rock formations such as depleted oil and gas fields, unmineable coal seams, or deep saline aquifers. Over time, the CO₂ becomes trapped through structural, residual, solubility, and mineral trapping mechanisms (Figure 2).
Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR): CO₂ is injected into aging oil fields to increase oil extraction while simultaneously storing the CO₂ underground (Figure 2). This dual purpose approach has gained traction due to its economic benefits.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of geological CO₂ storage systems, including depleted oil and gas fields, deep saline aquifers, unmineable coal seams, and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) sites. The diagram highlights key mechanisms such as structural, residual, solubility, and mineral trapping used to securely store CO₂ underground. Extracted from Mwenketishi, Benkreira, and Rahmanian (2023).
Oceanic storage: CO₂ can be sequestered in the deep ocean through injection into water columns below 1000 m or deposition on the sea floor at depths greater than 3000 m, where it may remain isolated for centuries (Figure 3). However, concerns over environmental impacts, legal regulations, and potential acidification pose significant challenges.
Figure 3. Concepts of oceanic CO₂ storage: Two primary methods are depicted, the dissolution type, where CO₂ dissolves rapidly in ocean water, and the lake type, where CO₂ remains as a liquid on the sea floor, forming a concentrated 'lake' before gradually dissolving. Extracted from Mwenketishi, Benkreira, and Rahmanian (2023).
As described by Eldardiry and Habib (2018) deep saline aquifers offer the greatest storage potential globally, with estimates suggesting their capacity exceeds hundreds of gigatonnes of CO₂. However, long-term monitoring is critical to ensure containment integrity and public safety.
Carbon Sequestration
Beyond geological storage, carbon sequestration involves converting CO₂ into stable forms through natural or engineered processes. One promising technique is mineral carbonation, wherein CO₂ reacts with magnesium or calcium rich rocks to form solid carbonates. As mentioned by Mwenketishi, Benkreira, and Rahmanian (2023), injecting CO₂ into basaltic formations can accelerate mineralization, effectively locking away CO₂ as stable rock within a few years. This method offers a permanent solution but requires significant energy input for CO₂ transport and injection.
Monitoring and Safety
Ensuring the safety and efficacy of CO₂ storage is paramount. Monitoring technologies play a crucial role in detecting leaks, tracking CO₂ plume migration, and verifying containment. Common methods include:
Seismic imaging: This technique uses sound waves to create detailed subsurface images, allowing researchers to track CO₂ movement within storage sites.
Tracer studies: Injected chemical tracers help identify and quantify potential leaks.
Surface monitoring: Measurements of soil gas and atmospheric CO₂ concentrations provide early warning signs of leaks.
Comprehensive monitoring frameworks not only enhance public trust but also support regulatory compliance, ensuring that storage projects meet environmental standards.
Challenges and Future Directions
While CCS holds immense promise, several challenges must be addressed to enable its widespread adoption:
Economic viability: High costs associated with capture, transport, and storage remain a significant barrier. Public and private investment in research and development is essential to reduce these costs.
Energy intensity: Current CCS processes require substantial energy inputs, which can offset their environmental benefits if powered by fossil fuels.
Public acceptance: Building public confidence in CCS technologies is crucial. Transparent communication about safety measures and long-term benefits can alleviate concerns.
Emerging technologies, such as covalent organic frameworks for CO₂ capture, offer hope for reducing costs and improving efficiency. As highlighted by Gammon (2024),these materials show potential for scaling up CCS while addressing economic and energy challenges.
Conclusion
Carbon capture, storage, and sequestration are indispensable tools in the fight against climate change. While the technology is still evolving, its ability to significantly reduce industrial emissions positions it as a cornerstone of global decarbonization strategies. By addressing existing challenges through innovation and collaboration, CCS can play a transformative role in achieving a sustainable, low carbon future.
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By clicking “Allow Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.
View our Privacy Policy for more information.
.webp)
